So, You’ve Got IOWs—What’s Next?

So, You’ve Got IOWs—What’s Next?

Integrity Operating Windows

The refining and petrochemical industries have recently seen an increased focus on integrity operating windows (IOWs). The first edition of API RP 584, Integrity Operating Windows (2014), and the subsequent release of the second edition (2020) have helped to raise awareness of IOW programs and how IOWs fit into an overall fixed equipment mechanical integrity (FEMI) program. While considerable time has been given to the work processes necessary to develop a set of IOW limits, less time and focus have been placed on how to manage those limits once they’ve been determined. This article will provide a brief background on IOWs before focusing on integrating IOWs into an existing FEMI program.

IOWs are defined as established limits for process parameters that affect the integrity of fixed equipment and piping. When operating parameters deviate from these limits, degradation is more likely to occur. IOWs should be considered a specific subset of a larger group of unit operating parameters (product quality, environmental limits, etc.). If operations are kept within these limits, degradation should be predictable; however, this does not necessarily mean low rates of damage.

API 584 defines IOWs in three categories:

  • Critical – requires the operator to take immediate predetermined actions to return the process variable within the IOW limits to prevent significant defined risks of potential equipment damage or hazardous fluid release or result in an emergency or rapid non-orderly shutdown.
  • Standard – requires predetermined operator intervention or corrective action by a subject matter expert (SME) if the duration of the exceedance is more than a specified time. Typically, the duration of exceedance could cause an increased degradation rate or introduce new damage mechanisms beyond those anticipated.
  • Informational – often less restrictive limits for Critical and Standard IOW limits, are for trending by the SME and, in some cases, may not be controllable by operations. An IOW Informational limit is a parameter that may be used to predict a change in corrosion potential.

 

So, you’ve defined your IOWs—now what? The real value of an IOW program begins after the limits are set. To truly move the needle on mechanical integrity, an IOW program must include clear actions for exceedances, robust monitoring and tracking systems, and integration into day-to-day operations and broader process safety practices. There’s a lot more to a successful IOW program than just a spreadsheet of limits. Read the full article in Inspectioneering Journal.

|

About The Author

Contact:
Mr. Caserta is a registered professional engineer in the states of Ohio and Texas. He has over 20 years of a wide breadth of engineering experience in oil refining, chemical processing, and consulting. Mr. Caserta's varied background provides unique insights into process interactions, equipment reliability, and corrosion and materials concerns. He currently oversees Becht’s corrosion control document (CCD) /integrity operating window (IOW) implementation team and risk-based inspection (RBI) team. He has personally been involved in development of CCDs and IOWs for over 100 different process units and RBI analysis for over 200 process units. The past 15 years of Mr. Caserta's career has focused on mechanical integrity, fixed equipment reliability, and inspection. He has a strong knowledge of damage mechanisms through practical experience. He has been involved in risk-based inspection assessments, mechanical integrity audits, and process engineering. He has experience as a Chief Inspector planning and executing turnarounds, supervising day-to-day inspection needs, and managing projects. Prior to joining Becht, Mr. Caserta served Inspection Supervisor at a 100,000 bpd refinery. During this time, he managed a team of over 25 inspection and engineering professionals. This experience included inspection planning and executing turnarounds, supervising day-to-day inspection needs, and managing projects. He has overseen a complete re-circuitization and inspection of refinery piping systems. Mr. Caserta is involved in the API Subcommittee on Inspection and Mechanical Integrity (SCIMI). He was the Vice-Chair of API 585 second edition and the Chair of the API 970 second edition on Corrosion Control Documents.

Authors Recent Posts

So, You’ve Got IOWs—What’s Next?
-->
Let Becht Turn Your Problem
Into Peace of Mind